Friday, April 3, 2026

The Daily Scroll

Where Every Story Has a Voice

Featured image: What Bon Appétit Loved in March Tells You Everything About Food Right Now
Food

What Bon Appétit Loved in March Tells You Everything About Food Right Now

The BA editors' picks are a mood board for where food culture is actually heading.

The List That's Not Just a List

Every month, the editors at Bon Appétit publish a round-up of things they tried, tasted, and loved. It reads like a group chat. It functions like a cultural thermometer. And the March edition — which dropped this week and immediately started circulating among food-obsessed corners of the internet — is more revealing than they probably intended it to be.

This isn't a press release. These are real picks, ranging from a $4 pantry staple to a restaurant dish that costs more than your electricity bill. Taken together, they sketch a portrait of where food culture is right now: simultaneously pulling toward comfort and novelty, toward the deeply local and the casually global.

What They Actually Picked (And What It Means)

The BA editors' March selections lean hard into a few categories: fermented and preserved things, single-origin pantry upgrades, and restaurant dishes that feel personal rather than performative. There's a jar of something pickled. There's a pasta. There's a hot sauce from a small producer in a city that isn't New York or Los Angeles.

Enjoying this? Get stories like this delivered daily.

Article photo 1

This is not an accident. Bon Appétit has spent the last two years recalibrating its voice — post-2020 reckoning, post-Adam Rapoport era — and the monthly picks column is one of the clearest signals of where that recalibration has landed. The message is: we care about craft, we care about sourcing, and we are done pretending that a $38 cocktail is inherently more interesting than a really good tinned fish.

The tinned fish, by the way, is still very much present. (It was never going anywhere.)

The Pantry Obsession Is Real and It Isn't Going Away

At least three of the March picks are shelf-stable pantry items. A finishing oil. A miso paste from a small Japanese-American producer. A vinegar that an editor apparently puts on everything, including, she notes, scrambled eggs. This tracks with a broader shift that's been building since 2021: the upgrade pantry movement.

Article photo 2

People stopped buying generic olive oil somewhere around 2022, and they haven't looked back. The market for single-origin, small-batch pantry staples has grown significantly — specialty food sales in the U.S. hit roughly $194 billion in 2023 according to the Specialty Food Association, and that number keeps climbing. BA's editors are not leading this trend. They're confirming it, which is its own kind of cultural signal.

There is a version of this that works. The March picks version mostly does. The recommendations feel earned rather than sponsored, and the specificity — brand names, where to buy, how they actually used it — is the difference between useful and decorative.

The Restaurant Picks Are Where It Gets Interesting

Two restaurant dishes made the March list. One is from a neighborhood spot in Chicago that's been open less than a year. The other is from a place in Los Angeles that's been quietly excellent for a decade and is only now getting the kind of national attention it deserved in 2015.

Article photo 3

The Chicago pick — a wood-fired vegetable dish at a restaurant I won't name here because the wait is already long enough — represents exactly the kind of discovery that BA does well when it's operating at its best. It's not Alinea. It's not a tasting menu. It's a $22 plate of charred cabbage that makes you reconsider every charred cabbage you've had before it.

The LA pick is more complicated. It's a beloved restaurant that's been on every local list for years, and its inclusion in a national round-up in March 2025 raises the obvious question: what took so long? (The answer, probably, is that an editor finally went there personally instead of relying on the institutional memory of a magazine that spent too long covering the same zip codes.)

The Drink Picks Reveal a Shift in How We Think About Alcohol

One of the March picks is non-alcoholic. This is notable not because non-alcoholic beverages are new — they're not — but because of how it's framed. It's not presented as an alternative or a compromise. It's presented as the thing an editor reached for because it tasted good. Full stop.

Article photo 4

The sober-curious movement has been gaining real commercial traction. Athletic Brewing raised over $50 million in funding. Seedlip is in every hotel minibar now. But the cultural shift — the moment when a non-alcoholic drink stops being a statement and starts being just a drink — that's newer. BA's March list is a small data point in that shift, but it's a meaningful one.

The other drink pick is a natural wine from a small Georgian producer. (The country, not the state.) This is the fourth time in the last six months I've seen Georgian wine appear in a major food publication's casual picks. It's not a trend anymore. It's a fixture.

A Brief Digression About Why These Lists Matter More Than They Should

I've been reading BA's monthly picks for years, and I'll be honest: I've bought things because of them. Not because I'm easily influenced, but because the format — short, specific, personal — cuts through in a way that long-form restaurant criticism sometimes doesn't. A review tells you whether a restaurant is worth your time. A picks list tells you what someone actually reached for on a Tuesday.

Article photo 5

There's something useful about that. We are drowning in food content. Every platform has a food vertical. Every celebrity has a cookbook. Every neighborhood has three new restaurants that all look identical — exposed brick, natural light, a menu with exactly twelve items, six of which are variations on the same dish. (I wrote about this problem last year and nothing has changed.) In that context, a list of things real people actually loved is a form of curation that has genuine value.

The risk, of course, is that it becomes a shopping list dressed up as editorial. The March BA picks mostly avoid this. Mostly.

What the March Picks Get Wrong

There are two picks in the March list that don't land. One is a kitchen gadget — a specific type of citrus press — that feels like it wandered in from a gift guide. It's fine. It presses citrus. This is not the kind of recommendation that earns its place in a cultural round-up.

Article photo 6

The other is a restaurant dish that's described in language so effusive it collapses under its own weight. "Life-changing" is a phrase that should be retired from food writing permanently, alongside "umami bomb" and anything involving the word "journey." The dish in question is a good pasta. It's not a life event.

This is the tension that every publication navigates with a format like this: the line between enthusiasm and hyperbole is thin, and crossing it doesn't just weaken the individual pick — it weakens the credibility of the whole list. If everything is life-changing, nothing is. If you want earned enthusiasm done right, look at how BA's own senior editor Sohla El-Waylly talks about food — specific, technical, personal, zero inflation. That's the standard.

The Broader Picture: What March 2025 Tastes Like

Step back from the individual picks and the BA March list tells you something about this specific moment in food culture. We are in a period of deliberate slowdown. Not slow food in the 1990s manifesto sense, but a genuine consumer preference for things that took time — fermented, aged, preserved, carefully sourced.

Article photo 7

We are also in a period of geographic expansion. The best food writing right now is happening in cities that weren't on the national radar five years ago — Louisville, Birmingham, Detroit, Portland (Oregon, not Maine, though Maine has its own thing happening). The BA picks reflect this, even if imperfectly.

And we are, quietly, in a period of price reckoning. Several of the March picks are explicitly affordable. An editor notes that the miso she loves costs $8 and lasts three months. Another points out that the hot sauce she can't stop using is $6 at a grocery store in her neighborhood and available online for $9. This is not accidental. After years of food media that treated expense as a proxy for quality, there's a correction happening. It's overdue.

If you're interested in what's driving ingredient obsessions right now, our piece on the Neapolitan Matzo Icebox Cake gets into the same pantry-first thinking from a different angle. And if you want comfort food that actually delivers, the Tax Day recipe round-up is worth your time.

Article photo 8

The Verdict

The BA March picks are better than average for this format. They're specific where specificity matters, personal without being precious, and honest about the fact that a good $6 hot sauce is more interesting than a mediocre $30 condiment. Two picks don't earn their place. The rest do.

More importantly, taken as a document of this cultural moment, the list is genuinely useful. It tells you what serious food people are reaching for in early 2025 — and the answer is: things with provenance, things with restraint, and things that taste like someone made a real decision somewhere along the way.

That's not a trend. That's a standard. It's about time.

Article photo 9

Some links in this article may earn us a small commission — at no extra cost to you.